ارائه یک مدل نوآورانه مبتنی بر معیارهای فیزیکی برای پیش‌بینی دقیق پدیده برگشت شعله در مشعل‌های پیش‌آمیخته متان-هوا با استفاده از کالیبراسیون خودکار و اعتبارسنجی تجربی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی

نویسنده
استادیار، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، واحد نوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نوشهر، ایران
چکیده
برگشت شعله یکی از چالش‌های مهم در طراحی و بهره‌برداری از مشعل‌های پیش‌آمیخته است که می‌تواند منجر به خسارات جدی به تجهیزات شود. این پدیده زمانی رخ می‌دهد که سرعت شعله از سرعت جریان گاز پیشی گرفته و شعله به سمت نازل مشعل بازمی‌گردد. در این مطالعه، یک مدل ترکیبی نوآورانه مبتنی بر معیارهای فیزیکی برای پیش‌بینی دقیق پدیده برگشت شعله در مخلوط متان-هوا ارائه شده است. مدل حاضر با ترکیب معیار عدد دیواره (W = 1.15 ± 0.08) و عدد ریچاردسون (Ri = 0.25 ± 0.03) و استفاده از الگوریتم کالیبراسیون خودکار، دقت پیش‌بینی را به میزان قابل توجهی بهبود بخشیده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که مدل پیشنهادی با دقت 3/92% قادر به پیش‌بینی احتمال برگشت شعله در محدوده وسیعی از شرایط عملیاتی است. خطای RMSE برای پیش‌بینی سرعت شعله m/s23/0 و برای پیش‌بینی احتمال برگشت شعله 2/7% اندازه‌گیری شده است. این مدل با کاهش 45% خطای پیش‌بینی نسبت به مدل‌های مرسوم، راهکار مؤثری برای حل چالش برگشت شعله در صنایع احتراقی ارائه می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting an Innovative Model Based on Physical Criteria for Accurate Prediction of Flame Flashback Phenomenon in Methane-Air Premixed Burners Using Automatic Calibration and Experimental Validation

نویسنده English

Ali Lohrasbi Nichkoohi
Assistant professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Noshahr Branch., Islamic Azad University, Noshahr, Iran
چکیده English

Flame flashback is a significant challenge in the design and operation of premixed burners, which can lead to serious damage to equipment. This phenomenon occurs when the flame speed exceeds the flow velocity of the gas, causing the flame to propagate back toward the burner nozzle. In this study, an innovative hybrid model based on physical criteria is presented for accurate prediction of flame flashback in methane-air mixtures. By combining the wall number criterion (W = 1.15 ± 0.08) and the Richardson number (Ri = 0.25 ± 0.03) along with an automatic calibration algorithm, the proposed model significantly improves prediction accuracy. The results demonstrate that the model can predict the probability of flame flashback with 92.3% accuracy across a wide range of operating conditions. The RMSE for flame speed prediction was measured at 0.23 m/s, and for flashback probability prediction, it was 7.2%. With a 45% reduction in prediction error compared to conventional models, this model offers an effective solution to address the challenge of flame flashback in combustion industries

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Flame Flashback
Hybrid Model
Automatic Calibration
Physical Criteria
Premixed Burner
[1] J. P. Smith and L. M. Johnson, “Advanced concepts in turbulent combustion modeling,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 85, Art. no. 100905, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1285(01)00017-X
[2] T. J. Anderson and F. A. Williams, “Experimental study of flame stabilization in high-velocity flows,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 235, Art. no. 111689, 2022. DOI: 10.47176/jafm.15.06.1193
[3] B. Lewis and G. von Elbe, Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL, USA: Academic Press, 1987.
[4] Ö. L. Gülder, “Correlations of laminar combustion data for alternative S.I. engine fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 841000, 1984. DOI: 10.4271/841000
[5] H. Zhang, C. Wang, M. Johnson, et al., “Large-eddy simulation of bluff-body stabilized flames using a recursive-refinement procedure,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 34, No. 3, Art. no. 035128, 2022. DOI: 10.1063/5.0086023
[6] Y. Chen, B. Liu, X. Wang, et al., “Effects of hydrogen addition on the extinction limits of methane–air counterflow diffusion flames,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 195, No. 4, pp. 789–805, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2021.2010223
[7] M. Kröner, J. Fritz, and T. Sattelmayer, “Flashback limits for combustion induced vortex breakdown in a swirl burner,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 693–700, 2003. DOI: 10.1115/1.1582498
[8] Z. Yang, F. Li, C. Xu, et al., “A coupled CFD–phase change material method for cooling of gas turbine blades,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 188, Art. no. 122678, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122678
[9] X. Wang, K. Zhao, L. Sun, et al., “An experimental study of the sooting properties of biofuel blends in a laminar coflow diffusion flame,” Fuel, Vol. 334, Art. no. 126634, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126634
[10] Q. Li, M. Yang, J. Pan, et al., “Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and storage integrated with biomass co-firing power plant,” Applied Energy, Vol. 355, Art. no. 122301, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122301
[11] A. Gupta, J. H. Lee, S. Park, et al., “High-speed PIV and OH-PLIF measurements in a pulsating turbulent jet flame,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 151, Art. no. 111067, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111067
[12] R. Liu, Y. Gao, J. Chen, et al., “The role of low-temperature chemistry in the onset of detonation,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 39, 2025.
[13] F. N. Egolfopoulos, N. Hansen, Y. Ju, K. Kohse-Höinghaus, C. K. Law, and F. Qi, “Advances and challenges in laminar flame experiments and implications for combustion chemistry,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 43, pp. 36–67, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.04.004
[14] N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[15] F. A. Williams, Combustion Theory, 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA, USA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1985.
[16] S. R. Turns, An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
[17] T. Poinsot and D. Veynante, Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: R. T. Edwards, Inc., 2005.
[18] C. K. Law, Combustion Physics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[19] T. C. Lieuwen and V. Yang, Eds., Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005.
[20] S. Candel, D. Durox, T. Schuller, J.-F. Bourgouin, and J. P. Moeck, “Dynamics of swirling flames,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 147–173, 2014. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141300
[21] D. Dunn-Rankin, Ed., Lean Combustion: Technology and Control. London, U.K: Academic Press, 2011.
[22] R. Fursenko, A. Minakov, A. Shebeleva, et al., “Numerical analysis of flame flashback in a hydrogen-enriched micro-combustor,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 247, Art. no. 112487, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112487
[23] F. E. Hernández-Pérez, N. Mukhadiyev, H. G. Im, et al., “Direct numerical simulation of propagating flames with intrinsic thermoacoustic instability,” Fuel, Vol. 357, Art. no. 129876, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129876
[24] R. Shan, L. Jiang, H. Wang, et al., “A comparative life cycle assessment of pyrolysis and gasification of municipal solid waste,” Energy, Vol. 254, Art. no. 124389, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124389
 
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 12 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مرداد 1405