ارزیابی دینامیکی تأثیر عمق حفره نمای دوپوسته با صفحه‌های هیبریدی بر انرژی فصلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی

نویسندگان
ایمان شمشادی 1
ایمان پیشکار دهکردی 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه صنعتی همدان، همدان، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
10.22034/stme.2026.556235.1184
چکیده
در این پژوهش، تحلیل جامعی به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر عمق حفره هوایی در نمای دوپوسته مجهز به صفحات خورشیدی هیبریدی ، بر بهینگی انرژی فصلی در ساختمان‌های اداری واقع در تهران انجام گرفته است. هدف اصلی مطالعه، تعیین عمق بهینه حفره برای دستیابی به کمینه مصرف انرژی و بیشینه بهره‌گیری از انرژی خورشیدی در طول سال بوده است. برای این منظور، مدل سیستم با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای TRNSYS و MATLAB توسعه داده شد و داده‌های اقلیمی شهر تهران به‌عنوان شرایط مرزی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. در چارچوب تحلیل پارامتریک، ۲۲ پیکربندی مختلف با اعماق حفره بین ۵ تا ۱۰۰ سانتی‌متر مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. شاخص‌های کلیدی عملکرد شامل بار گرمایشی و سرمایشی، تراز انرژی الکتریکی (تولید و مصرف خالص) و میزان کاهش انتشار دی‌اکسیدکربن برای هر پیکربندی محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد که تغییر عمق حفره تأثیر معناداری بر رفتار ترمودینامیکی سیستم، از جمله الگوی جریان هوا، نرخ انتقال حرارت و بازده کلی سامانه خورشیدی دارد. بر اساس نتایج، عمق بهینه حفره برای شرایط اقلیمی تهران در فصول گرم برابر با ۲۰ سانتی‌متر و در فصول سرد ۳۰ سانتی‌متر تعیین گردید. همچنین، افزایش عمق تا حدود ۸۰ سانتی‌متر موجب تولید برق و کاهش مصرف انرژی اولیه تا حدود ۹۵ درصد نسبت به حالت مرجع شد. نوآوری این پژوهش در یکپارچه‌سازی ارزیابی عددی دینامیکی نمای دوپوسته با سامانه‌های خورشیدی هیبریدی و ارائه راهنمای طراحی بهینه بر پایه شرایط فصلی اقلیم تهران است. یافته‌های این مطالعه می‌تواند به‌عنوان مبنایی علمی برای طراحی ساختمان‌های اداری پایدار و کم‌مصرف مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
شبیه سازی عددی
نمای دو پوسته
صفحات خورشیدی هیبریدی
عمق حفره هوایی
بهینگی انرژی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Dynamic Assessment of the Impact of Cavity Depth in a Double‑skin façade Integrated with Hybrid Panels on Seasonal Energy Performance

نویسندگان English

Iman Shemshadi 1
Iman Pishkar Dehkordi 2
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of cavity depth in a double‑skin façade (DSF) integrated with hybrid solar panels (PV/T) on seasonal energy performance in office buildings in Tehran. The primary objective was to determine the optimal cavity depth to achieve minimized energy consumption and maximized utilization of solar energy throughout the year. For this purpose, a dynamic system model was developed using TRNSYS and MATLAB software suites, with real climatic data from Tehran city employed as boundary input conditions. Within a parametric analysis framework, 22 distinct configurations with cavity depths ranging from 5 to 100 cm were evaluated. Heating and cooling loads, net electricity balance, and CO₂ emission reductions were computed for each case.
Results indicate that cavity depth markedly affects airflow patterns, heat transfer rates, and overall solar system efficiency. For Tehran’s climate, optimal depths were 20 cm for warm seasons and 30 cm for cold seasons. Increasing depth to about 80 cm improved power generation and cut primary energy consumption by up to 95% relative to the reference case. The novelty of this work lies in coupling dynamic numerical assessment of double‑skin façades with hybrid solar systems and offering a season‑specific design guide for Tehran’s conditions. These outcomes provide a scientific foundation for designing energy‑efficient, sustainable office buildings and offer practical insights for architects, energy consultants, and policymakers seeking to integrate passive‑active solar solutions in semi‑arid continental climates.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Numerical Simulation
Double-Skin Facade
Hybrid Solar panels
Air Cavity Depth
Energy Optimization
[1] A. N. Tombazis, “Architectural design: A multifaceted approach,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 5, Nos. 5–8, pp. 893–899, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0960-1481(94)90109-0
[2] C. Vassiliades, C. Minterides, O. E. Astara, G. Barone, I. Vardopoulos, “Socioeconomic barriers to adopting energy-saving bioclimatic strategies in a Mediterranean sustainable real estate setting: A quantitative analysis of resident perspectives,” Energies, Vol. 16, Art. no. 7952, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/en16247952
[3] European Commission, “The 2020 climate and energy package,” European Commission, Climate Action, 2009. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2020-climate-energy-package_en
[4] S. Karytsas, I. Vardopoulos, and E. Theodoropoulou, “Factors affecting sustainable market acceptance of residential microgeneration technologies: A two time period comparative analysis,” Energies, Vol. 12, Art. no. 3298, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12173298
[5] I. Shemshadi, “Modeling and optimization of microgrid networks using renewable energy sources,” Frontiers in Health Informatics, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2024.
[6] J. Rosenow, R. Cowart, E. Bayer, and M. Fabbri, “Assessing the European Union’s energy efficiency policy: Will the winter package deliver on ‘Efficiency First’?” Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 26, pp. 72–79, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.022
[7] C. Italos, M. Patsias, A. Yiangou, S. Stavrinou, and C. Vassiliades, “Use of double skin façade with building integrated solar systems for an energy renovation of an existing building in Limassol, Cyprus: Energy performance analysis,” Energy Reports, Vol. 8, pp. 15144–15161, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.088
[8] Z. Ioannidis, A. Buonomano, A. K. Athienitis, and T. Stathopoulos, “Modeling of double skin façades integrating photovoltaic panels and automated roller shades: Analysis of the thermal and electrical performance,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 154, pp. 618–632, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.046
[9] M. C. M. Probst and C. Roecker, Architectural Integration and Design of Solar Thermal Systems. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL Press, 2011.
[10] I. Vardopoulos, M. Santamouris, A. A. Zorpas, G. Barone, C. Italos, and C. Vassiliades, “A comparative study on discrepancies in residential building energy performance certification in a Mediterranean context,” Buildings, Vol. 14, No. 4, Art. no. 1009, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14041009
[11] H. Poirazis, Double Skin Facades for Office Buildings. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 2004.
[12] I. Shemshadi, “An overview of the methods of combining heat pump and hybrid solar collectors,” Science and Technology in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 67–91, 2025. DOI: 10.22034/stme.2025.509066.1108 (in Persian)
[13] E. Gratia and A. De Herde, “The most efficient position of shading devices in a double-skin facade,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 364–373, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.001
[14] International Energy Agency, Solar Energy Perspectives. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2011.
[15] ASHRAE, Advanced Energy Design Guide for Large Hospitals: Achieving 50% Energy Savings Toward a Net Zero Energy Building. Atlanta, GA, USA: ASHRAE, 2012.
[16] United Nations Environment Programme, 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2021.
[17] B. Givoni, Passive and Low Energy Cooling of Buildings. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.
[18] ASHRAE, ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Systems and Equipment. Atlanta, GA, USA: ASHRAE, 2017.
[19] N. Lechner, Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[20] United Nations Environment Programme, 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2020.
[21] A. Alberto, N. M. M. Ramos, and R. M. S. F. Almeida, “Parametric study of double-skin facades performance in mild climate countries,” Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 12, pp. 87–98, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.05.013
[22] O. Iken, S. E.-D. Fertahi, M. Dlimi, R. Agounoun, I. Kadiri, and K. Sbai, “Thermal and energy performance investigation of a smart double skin facade integrating vanadium dioxide through CFD simulations,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 195, pp. 650–671, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.070
[23] C. S. Lee, H. Lee, M. Choi, and J. Yoon, “Design optimization and experimental evaluation of photovoltaic double skin facade,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 202, Art. no. 109314, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.031
[24] G. Barone, C. Vassiliades, C. Elia, A. Savvides, and S. Kalogirou, “Design optimization of a solar system integrated double-skin façade for a clustered housing unit,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 215, Art. no. 119023, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119023
[25] F. P. Incropera, D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, and A. S. Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2022, pp. 211–215.
[26] Z. Wu, L. Zhang, X. Su, J. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Experimental and numerical analysis of naturally ventilated PV-DSF in a humid subtropical climate,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 200, pp. 633–646, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.108
[27] A. Dama, D. Angeli, and O. K. Larsen, “Naturally ventilated double-skin façade in modeling and experiments,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 144, pp. 17–29, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.038
[28] G. Barone, C. Vassiliades, C. Elia, A. Savvides, and S. Kalogirou, “Design optimization of a solar system integrated double-skin façade for a clustered housing unit,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 215, Art. no. 119023, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119023
[29] R. J. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, Forecasting: Principles and Practice, 3rd ed. Melbourne, Australia: OTexts, 2021.
[30] C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error over the root mean square error in assessing average model performance,” Climate Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 79–82, 2005. DOI: 10.3354/cr030079
[31] R. J. Hyndman and A. B. Koehler, “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy,” International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 679–688, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001
[32] C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error over the root mean square error in assessing average model performance,” Climate Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 79–82, 2005. DOI: 10.3354/cr030079
[33] K. E. Taylor, “Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, No. D7, pp. 7183–7192, 2001. DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900719‏
 
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مرداد 1405